-
Print
-
-
-
Email this link
Share Link
Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this link
or copy the link directly:
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.
-
News for January, 2020
You're looking at 1–10 of 36 items.
January 31, 2020
Supreme Court dismisses appeal from Court of Appeal, and affirms order striking out proceedings on appeal from the High Court - where the original application had been for a stay on a reference to an independent architect for resolution of a construction dispute - on the grounds that: (a) reference to an independent expert was not the same as arbitration; (b) the reference to an independent expert was governed by the terms of the relevant contract; (c) the independent expert was entitled to determine matters of law if that was contemplated by the contractual terms; (d) the courts could only intervene if the independent expert stepped outside the terms of his remit; and (e) in the instant case, the independent expert should have been allowed to proceed with his determination.
January 31, 2020
Lee Sharpe summarizes recent developments in UK tax.
January 31, 2020
Disputes with HMRC can be daunting, particularly if there is disagreement on a technical point. The resources available to HMRC in such a dispute are potentially intimidating.
January 31, 2020
Julian Harris summarises selected recent decisions.
January 31, 2020
Andrew Needham comments on recent VAT developments
January 28, 2020
In the first edition of our Family Law Briefing, solicitor and author Keith Walsh talks us through some of the core changes that have been brought about by the Family Law Act 2019.
January 28, 2020
The latest issue, [2020] 1 FCR 2, is now live for subscribers to Family Court Reports. The following cases are included: Re C (a child), [2020] 3 FCR 107; R (TT) v Registrar General for England and Wales (nos 1 and 2), [2020] 3 FCR 114; S-L (children: adjournment), [2020] 3 FCR 206.
January 27, 2020
High Court dismisses proceedings seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant preventing defendant from taking up a position at a competitor within 12 months, finding that, while the plaintiff had discharged the onus of proving that it had a legitimate interest in protecting the information that would come to the defendant’s knowledge in the course of his employment, the restraint on trade was too wide and was therefore unjustified and unenforceable.
You're looking at 1–10 of 36 items.