Show Summary Details
Vol.27 No.3 Case Commentaries The scientific perspective: ‘material contribution to risk of harm’ as a response to an evidentiary gap The moral and legal perspective: ‘material contribution to risk of harm’ imposes a choice between corrective justice and utilitarianism. Conclusion: does the law tamper with the ‘but for’ test at its peril? ...
Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd: a cautionary tale for causation
Journal of Professional Negligence
- Edited by:
- Colm McGrath and Isabel Barter
- Publisher:
- Bloomsbury Professional
- Publication Date:
- September 2024
If you would like to access this content, but you are not currently a subscriber, please sign up for a free trial here. If you already subscribe to this service please login here.