Show Summary Details
Vol.28 No.4 1. Introduction – the issue 2. The definition of ‘damage’ including contingent liability – the general rule 3. The Sephton exception – ‘pure’ contingent liability does not count as damage 4. Subsequent authorities – Sephton isolated 5. Objective financial detriment – requirement for ‘damage’ or not? 6. Concurrent but not identical – problem of eliding contract and tort 7. Comparison with definition of damage in personal injury negligence cases 8. Taking stock 9. Conclusion ...
The meaning of ‘damage’ in pure financial loss cases: contract and tort collide
Journal of Professional Negligence
- Edited by:
- Colm McGrath and Isabel Barter
- Publisher:
- Bloomsbury Professional
- Publication Date:
- September 2024
If you would like to access this content, but you are not currently a subscriber, please sign up for a free trial here. If you already subscribe to this service please login here.