New & NoteworthyRSS Feed

June 19, 2024

Plaintiffs Not Entitled to Relitigate Previous Personal Injury Claim

Waliszewski v Republic of Ireland [2024] IEHC 351 (High Court, Bolger J, 11 June 2024)

High Court dismissed the plaintiff's proceedings, which sought to challenge the outcome of a previous personal injury claim and related appeals, on the grounds that the current claims were an abuse of process, frivolous, vexatious, and bound to fail, as they constituted a collateral attack on the decisions of the High Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court. The plaintiff's grievances against the handling of his original case by the courts and his former solicitors had no credible basis.

High Court – dismissal – abuse of process – frivolous and vexatious – collateral attack – personal injury claim – inherent jurisdiction – finality in litigation – Order 19, Rule 28 (RSC)Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 – Section 26 of the Act of 2004 – appeal – Court of Appeal – Supreme Court – inherent jurisdiction – constitutional rights – EU Treaties – Universal Declaration of Human Rights – costs.

June 18, 2024

Google could not be added as Defendant in Defamation Case as Limitation Period had Expired

Gilroy & Anor v O'Leary [2024] IEHC 349 (High Court, Hyland J, 5 June 2024)

High Court refused an application by the plaintiffs to join Google as a defendant in a defamation case concerning a video published on YouTube, on the grounds that the plaintiffs' claim against Google was manifestly time-barred, as the video in question was first published on 23 June 2018, and the motion to join Google was not brought until after the one-year limitation period, extendable to a maximum of two years, had expired. The cause of action against Google accrued on the date the video was first viewable online, dismissing the plaintiffs' argument that the cause of action should start from the date they requested Google to remove the video.

Defamation – Google – YouTube – Statute of Limitations Act 1957 – time-barred – publication – joinder of defendant – Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC) – Order 15 Rule 4 – inherent jurisdiction – High Court – cause of action – Defamation Act 2009 – limitation period – secondary publisher – manifestly statute barred.


Looking for information on Brexit? Click here

Looking for information on Coronavirus? Click here

Quick start guide

If you need some help using the site, the following links should get you started.


Standard Search

Shows how to use the powerful and flexible Bloomsbury Professional site search.

Reviewing and Refining Search Results

When a search returns many results, it is useful to be able to filter those results to a particular type of content - e.g. commentary, legislation or case law - or limit the results to just one book. This section also highlights a key feature in Bloomsbury Professional search - the ability to search again just within a set of search results. So e.g. a search for "brand" will produce many results, but then searching within those results for "valuation" helps you focus on just the materials that you need.


Browse your books

This section shows how to use the table of contents and move from one page to another within a book.

Bloomsbury Professional Law Online

Downloads of paginated PDF versions of individual chapters, etc, are being added to the service all the time.

Subscribers to Bloomsbury Professional Law Online can see all the PDF downloads currently available by clicking the link below:

Obiter Dicta Podcast

Listen to the latest episodes of the Obiter Dicta Podcast from Bloomsbury Professional Ireland. Each month, Grainne McMahon and Rachel Sherlock interview leading authors and practitioners to discuss legal and tax developments. Available from all leading platforms or wherever you get your podcasts! Click here to listen.

Looking for a precedent? Click here